You can login or register now:

Register:

Nickname *

Your email *

Password *

Login:

Email

Password

Starkey Otolens - my review

2010-07-30 14:59:00 in Digital Hearing Aids by  skunker
Hey everybody,

I'm staying here wearing my new Otolens. Just lifted them up yesterday. On the off chance that you're pondering, I have around 80db misfortune in the high frequencies.

This is the first occasion when I've worn HAs since I was in grade school (I'm 29 now). I was conceived HOH.

My survey:

I had my ear waterway impressions taken a week ago. It was somewhat difficult (this may fluctuate with certain audis).

In under 6 days, Starkey sent us the Otolens! I attempted them on interestingly yesterday and was extremely inspired.

The Good:

- genuinely INVISIBLE! I have taken photographs of the side of my head, including utilizing a little mirror, and can not see the guides by any means.

- I would now be able to hear sounds I've never listened (a few sorts of flying creatures, alert framework initiation, and so on)

- discourse is clearer

- entirely simple to put HA in ear in the wake of rehearsing a couple of times

- simple to expel in the wake of honing a couple of times

- before long, the sentiment "having something in your ear" leaves

The Bad:

- First time it was somewhat agonizing in my correct ear. Couldn't open jaw the distance without distress.

- About $3500 a piece (x2 for both ears )

- Cant' appear to get the T2 work (volume/memory control by means of mobile phone) to work yet....but I have an appt with my audi in around 1 week, so we'll investigate at that point.

Innovation is always developing at a fast pace...I have an inclination the Otolens will be obsolete in around 2 years. I believe we're on the precarious edge of some astounding stuff that can put enough power for significant hearing misfortune clients like myself. We're not exactly there yet, but rather I think the Otolens is the first of its kind in this undetectable listening device field.

I have not had the opportunity to test them out in "this present reality" as I live alone and have not escaped the house yet. Will report back right on time one week from now.

Here are the pics to give you a thought of how prudent they are. Despite everything I don't know whether I can see them or not...can you?

0

Add comment:

skunker Originally Posted by vd1

You didn't have any guarantee at first?

"Starkey offers thorough Worry Free Warranty scope for all portable hearing assistant brands. Accessible as long as your amplifiers are in appropriate working condition, our arrangements give assurance against disappointment, harm and even misfortune. We additionally offer Worry Free Warranty Loss, Damage, and Repair scope on other portable amplifier brands. Solicit your listening ability proficient which one from our adaptable security arranges best meets your listening ability and way of life needs.

New Starkey portable amplifiers accompanied a restricted guarantee. It would be ideal if you contact your listening device authority, audiologist or ENT specialist to get insights about your particular guarantee arrange."

I had a 2 year guarantee when I got them in 2010. My canine ate them the month after the guarantee lapsed. I later discovered that my audiologist that sold me the match in 2010 had as of late expanded his guarantee to 3 years....but I was past the point of no return for that. The new match I have now is useful for a long time.

vd1 You did not have any guarantee at first?

"Starkey offers thorough Worry Free Warranty scope for all amplifier brands. Accessible as long as your listening devices are in legitimate working condition, our arrangements give insurance against disappointment, harm and even misfortune. We likewise offer Worry Free Warranty Loss, Damage, and Repair scope on other portable amplifier brands. Solicit your listening ability proficient which one from our adaptable assurance arranges best meets your listening ability and way of life needs.

New Starkey portable amplifiers accompanied a restricted guarantee. If it's not too much trouble contact your portable amplifier master, audiologist or ENT specialist to get insights about your particular guarantee arrange."

Bogey If you have any sort of rider protection arrangement, (gems for instance, and for our situation golf clubs subsequent to getting them stolen twice), you can add HAs to that strategy. I don't know what the cost was, but rather it was quite modest, AND, significantly not as much as getting them at an ordinary cost. Expectation that makes a difference.

skunker Originally Posted by vd1

Skunker, what amount did you pay for supplanting eaten Soundlenses?

$1999/ear for the Soundlens adaptation 9.

vd1 Skunker, what amount did you pay for supplanting eaten Soundlenses?

Behra Thanks Skunker for sharing your excursion enterprise to starkey HQ. My audi revealed to me that the fitting extent for soundlens is sufficiently bad for my sort of hearing misfortune, the pwr pick up on soundlens goes up to 35 db and I require significantly more. He recommended to attempt Wi arrangement i110 CIC that accompanies remote innovation. I truly thought soundlens will work for me as its working for you and we have practically comparable high pitch hearing misfortune. I am considering getting a moment sentiment from other audi. Was your audiogram inside fitting extent for soundlens? Much appreciated!

skunker Originally Posted by vd1

Skunker, How long did it take Starkey to make the new Soundlenses, from form to conclusive fitting and tuning?

I was there from 11am - 430pm, however there were different patients there so I wasn't continually being "worked" on.

vd1 Skunker, How long did it take Starkey to make the new Soundlenses, from form to definite fitting and tuning?

prashanth venkataswamy yes...it is totally an unquestionable requirement ...

" that your mind need to adjust to all the new sounds"

skunker Originally Posted by vd1

Sorry Skunker,

I don't get it totally, you went to nearby HA distributor, arrange value, he/she made a cast and submitted trial to Starkey, you got HA from the suspender and travel to Starkey HQ. Is it adjust?

Salud

Apologies, I perceive how you are befuddled!

I asked (by means of email) a few audiologists to submit me their best cost. I discovered one that I enjoyed, met with them, and had them arrange me another match of Soundlens. I had a more seasoned combine of Soundlens that were eaten by my puppy, so this new audiologist could get the serial numbers from that old match and have Starkey remake new match for me. When I got them, they didn't fit too well thus I called Starkey inquiring as to whether they could make new ear molds for me so I could show signs of improvement fit. They said yes, so I at that point flew up to see them. Expectation that bodes well!

vd1 Sorry Skunker,

I don't get it totally, you went to nearby HA distributor, arrange value, he/she made a cast and submitted trial to Starkey, you got HA from the suspender and travel to Starkey HQ. Is it adjust?

Here's to you

skunker Just got once more from my excursion to Starkey home office in Minneapolis. It was certainly an ordeal and I am happy I went. I spent an entire day there at their office and got the opportunity to meet and converse with a portion of the Soundlens specialists. What was fascinating was that a portion of the architects and audiologists on staff were additionally Soundlens clients, so we could impart on a similar level on a few parts of my worries. Once more, the fundamental motivation behind why I made the outing there to Starkey was on the grounds that I couldn't get the fit perfectly with my past audiologists. I don't point the finger at them- - this is a perplexing portable amplifier to fit since each ear is distinctive. As I sat at the table with different patients waiting on their arrangements, I discovered they were likewise Soundlens wearers and we as a whole again had something in like manner to discuss. The issues they had were additionally fit-related(!). The slick thing about Starkey (I concede I was a little humiliated when the ball was in my court) was that the work was all open- - you really get the chance to watch different patients have their ears clean through video, and also a live perspective of the fitting/shaping procedure. The staff was inviting, however they beyond any doubt were occupied with orders going back and forth. I was there an entire day for everything from another hearing test, ear cleaning, one-on-one discourse with an audiologist, impressions, fit testing, and programming tweaking. This was the sort of care I required in the event that I would pay as much as possible for these things AND have them be such a tremendous piece of my social life. Should go to the source and complete it by specialists. I trust I got a solid match and I think the product has been changed to make it more agreeable for me to wear them (I had issues with my voice sounding "tinny" when talking- - this obliged Starkey to cut down my low frequencies [no issue since I have great lows] , they likewise made the vent opening bigger).

Unfortunatley, there was an immense misfortune: I appear to have gotten a clog/sinus issue with my ears and they have been stopped up the whole day I was at starkey. This may have influenced the capacity for me to get an incredible fit. I attempted to pop my ears and drink hot tea, wash up, and so forth however nothing worked. The "stopped up" sensation appeared to have been exacerbated by the impression procedure and they are STILL stopped up as I compose this. The impression procedure was somewhat excruciating as the ear weight was changed amid the evacuation of the shape (I think, not 100% beyond any doubt yet). It might be because of the reality I likewise flew in a hour before and my equilibirum was not yet back to typical? I anticipate that this will clear any day now.

To the audiologists perusing this post: There were some audiologists that carried some of their patients alongside them. ONe had 2 clients he flew with to Starkey. I felt that was decent. I'm certain it's not functional for all audiologists to do this, but rather I can disclose to you that these patients are clients for life for this audiologist.

The other thing I preferred about the Starkey visit was the free breakfast and lunch for patients in the cafeteria, and also the free transportation from the air terminal to Starkey (however some Starkey reps likewise dropped off the patients at the air terminal, yet since I didn't ask for it, I took a $20 carry ride to the airplane terminal). There's likewise the pleasant rebate from Starkey at the nearby 4 star Marriot ($90/night) which additionally gives free transport transportation to Starkey! All things considered, it was an extremely shabby outing for me (shoddy southwest tickets at $50, excluding focuses I had from a Mastercard), particularly considering the significance of getting the guides fit perfectly and to my level of fulfillment. The trek likewise place me in coordinate contact with a rep that will actually assist all my future conveyances and requirements.

I concede, the jury is still out on the Soundlens, however part of that is because of the reality my listening ability misfortune is so serious and I am spot on the fringe. What I do know is that I'm more joyful now than I was with them preceding the trek.

vd1 Thank you.

Um bongo Originally Posted by vd1

My audiologist is energgetic fellow who has 20+ years of experience yet for the most part with Resound,

Do you feel that fitting Soundlens requires som uncommon expectation to absorb information with Soundlens or being simply

experienced audiologist would be sufficient.

Fitting IIC requires a touch of aptitude to deliver a past the second curve impression. The programming ought to be direct, however whether you will discover the guide agreeable and whether it sounds alright is another issue.

vd1 My audiologist is energgetic fellow who has 20+ years of experience however for the most part with Resound,

Do you feel that fitting Soundlens requires som exceptional expectation to learn and adapt with Soundlens or being simply

experienced audiologist would be sufficient.

Um bongo Originally Posted by vd1

Would you be able to please impart your experience to Resound Verso iic?

Never fitted one, I used to keep running in heaps of issues with their ITE item; principally on the grounds that they used to hand complete them blindfolded or so we thought. Their item dependability on the secluded Be arrangement was horrifying and the Live arrangement appears to require a larger number of repairs than other comparable ITE.

Given the particular troubles of the IIC arrange: I'm not going to chance my clients' understanding.

vd1 Can you please share your involvement with Resound Verso iic?

Um bongo Originally Posted by vd1

It would appear that hearsd.com soundlens 11 for 2046 is a decent cost...

In all trustworthiness, running with the least expensive cost on an item with a major potential for fit issues and disappointments as talked about further up in the string is probably not going to yield the best client encounter. Of the considerable number of items I have fitted over the most recent couple of years the one with the most RTM (Return To Manufacturer) issues is the Soundlens.

Given that you will be investing a considerable measure of energy in their office, I figure it's genuinely sensible to strike up a decent association with a gadget/Audiologist who is close-by and has understanding of fitting them.

vd1 It looks like hearsd.com soundlens 11 for 2046 is a decent cost...

skunker Originally Posted by vd1

Would you be able to please give me the audi telephone/email who offers soundlens 11 for 1999?

Here's the means by which I did it:

1.) Go to truhearing.com and you will see estimating for the 3 variants of Soundlens: 7, 9, and 11. http://www.truhearing.com/hearing_ai...ey/soundlens_9 . The version9 is for 2195/ear!

Or, on the other hand,

2.) Call or email different audiologists around your zone and approach them at their best cost. I could discover one that gave me a superior arrangement (about $200 less per ear) than truhearing.com!

After you do all that, contact Starkey home office and have them actually fit you these things in light of the fact that a large portion of the audiologists I have conversed with don't have much involvement. I assumed if i"m going to pay as much as possible for these gadgets AND they are such an essential angle to my social life, I should get the best specialists/audiologists to work with - GO STRAIGHT TO THE SOURCE. Starkey will fit you another impression, give you a fresh out of the box new audiogram, and so on for FREE, as long as your Soundlens is under guarantee. They will even get you at the airplane terminal AND give you a markdown at a decent nearby inn to remain at. The main thing you need to do is pay for your own airfare there. After all that is done, you can transport the changed records to your audiologist so they can keep them on document. Likewise, you can do catch up visits with your own nearby audiologist (unless you need to travel to Starkey HQ once more, lol).

vd1 Can you please give me the audi telephone/email who offers soundlens 11 for 1999?

skunker An intriguing update....

I paid more than 7k for these HAs back when they were discharged in mid 2010. Fortunately, protection paid around 2k of that....but still...the sticker price stung for a considerable length of time.

After a touch of research, I've possessed the capacity to discover neighborhood audiologists that will offer fresh out of the box new ones for 1,999/ear! That additionally incorporates administrations, repair, and 3 year guarantee. Not terrible, imho. Still somewhat high, however this is more workable.

jgirardi First - Shoot the canine.

Second - Get new listening devices.

RobinH Originally Posted by Malatesta

I'm 28, and I've been wearing portable hearing assistants since I was 3. I have around a 60db misfortune in the low mid frequencies in both ears. I wore Starkeys when I was more youthful, however I've been wearing Siemens CICs since 2001, and while going into the audiologist this week for new listening device talks I was persuaded to experiment with the Otolens. They've been requested and are headed. I'll give my own audit about my involvement with them when they come in.

I have unexpected sound needs in comparison to many individuals as I do work with live sound and I like a guide that most precisely and normally creates the real stable with insignificant preparing impacts. The way that they are nearer to the eardrum is the thing that sold me, not by any means on a perceivability viewpoint, yet only that in principle they'll ideally simply enable me to hear somewhat more normally; I needn't bother with any favor directional mics or anything.

I've been content with the Siemens sound quality in the guides I've worn so we'll perceive how diverse these are. The CICs I wear are pretty dang little as of now so I'm interested to see exactly how much little these Otolenses are.

Malatesta,

I know your post was long back yet was interested in the event that you wound up getting these and what the outcomes were. I have a comparative hearing misfortune in the low end and I don't know whether these might work for me or not. Up until this point, I've attempted 2 distinct HAs utilizing 2 diverse audiologists with extremely poor outcomes. Neither helped me hear better. I've done some examination on invert incline misfortune however neither of these audiologists were proficient about programming for that sort of misfortune. In the event that any of the experts here would remark on whether they think this may be workable for me, please let me know.

Much appreciated!

skunker Hello everybody.

These amplifiers had a terrible passing. My pooch just ate them BOTH throughout the end of the week. Presently, I'm scrambling attempting to discover how to get another match without breaking the bank...my insurance agency does not pay for them and my real amplifier guarantee has terminated (2 months prior).

A misfortune at what to do...

brian74 Originally Posted by aprsl

Stunning that your audi let you leave the workplace without adequate preparing or without them understanding that you were not embeddings them effectively.

I was in a comparable vessel with my audi. She initially revealed to me that I won't not be content with the fit (they weren't anyplace close the extent that they could or ought to go). Didn't generally go over how to get them in. The primary couple of days it was awkward. Be that as it may, I was resolved and made sense of it all alone how to place them in appropriately. They are currently essentially undetectable (somebody would need to look hard to see them and furthermore have the ideal lighting). The sound is great, my discourse cognizance is near ordinary I would state, and they have made an immense change! Extremely glad. Can't put a cost on having the capacity to hear and liking the portable amplifiers.

brian74 I additionally have the Soundlens. They make an incredible showing with regards to and practically undetectable. When they are placed in, I scarcely see them. Took a bit to get used to them, however I once I did, it's been generally extraordinary! Good fortunes.

brian74 Originally Posted by skunker

For those with the Otolens/iSync ...do you all vibe like you have something stuffed in your ear when you wear them?

My left ear is fine...no "stopped" sensation there, however my correct ear waterway feels like it's stopped. I had my audi trim down the guide, yet it's as yet feeling very stuffed in there.

I have just had the Soundlens for a couple of days, however I am rapidly getting used to them. In some ways I feel as if I could have utilized more assistance from the audi. This is my first time wearing HA, and I was given quite recently genuine essential directions on the best way to embed them. I am taking in a considerable measure all alone essentially. As they begin better, I am truly awed by the intangibility of them and the execution. Goodness! I was at an outside gathering today and I was truly ready to take after all the discussion going on. I am truly inspired with the Soundlens.

For your inquiry, yes and no. I contemplate fit. At in the first place, the left was quite great, however the correct felt stuffed. I think I have made sense of (all alone) how to truly get an awesome fit. This works for me, and perhaps, quite possibly, it will help you too. Have a go at taking the inverse hand (left hand for your correct ear, and the other way around) and have a go at pulling the skin (tenderly obviously ) close to your eye/brow/cheek, and so on towards your nose (which appears to augment and open up the ear trench). While you do this with your head turned towards your left side, utilize your forefinger on your correct hand (to the correct ear) and embed the Soundlens. It goes in effectively for me, and essentially bolts it into put. I have discovered that this strategy works truly well for me. It enables me to effectively and firmly embed the guide profound inside my waterway. It doesn't move, hurt, and it is certainly more profound than it beforehand was. I additionally saw that as the guide gets close to the ear drum, the sound is clearer and has less input. Ideally this makes a difference.

ZCT Originally Posted by dontay

Entertainingly enough the top value I was cited really originated from what is most likely the greatest, most established & understood (surely by the more established era) chain in the UK. In light of the all out "crusade" adverts in the national press each month they MUST have a gigantic publicizing spending plan! I'm apprehensive I concluded that I'm not going to be the trick that compensation's for it!! The least expensive quote I had was additionally from a popular store (yet claimed by Starkey!) My audiologist (free) couldn't exactly coordinate it yet cited a cost at the lower end of the scale... I chose to pay more basically to have the advantage of totally free mastery & no steadfastness to a specific maker! That was most likely a terrible cost choice on my part however the person IS extraordinary so no issue!

I used to work for a few those chains some time ago. Concealed Hearing and Amplivox/Ultratone/Sietech (couldn't appear to pick one name!).

From one perspective the chains have gigantic purchasing force and charge stunning discount costs from the producers subsequently. Be that as it may, their overheads are staggering, a national foundation, neighborhood and national promoting efforts, bolster staff, organization autos, free home visits (in any event when I was there), and so on. Also the high moving top managerial staff, and now and again shareholders.

Initially Posted by dontay

With respect to the "decision" issue... I know you're actually one-sided towards Starkey & sincerely make no mystery of that.. & I've positively had first rate benefit from them, that is without a doubt! I CAN see your point from a 'value break' supply & request see however (dependably a yet!) as a client I would be thinking about whether I had gotten the best guide for my conditions or on the off chance that I had passed up a great opportunity for something better on the grounds that my decisions had been limited to just a few producers. For example Siemens have now turned out with the main genuine (up 'til now) rivalry for the Soundlens IIC... I'm trialing the Soundlens right now & in spite of the fact that my trenches are fine for IIC's I just barely make it in the decibel misfortune stakes & so need to endure the resulting input issues... on the off chance that I need IIC's. Starkey & Siemens both claim to have the honey bees knees in best criticism administration. I now HAVE to consider if the Imini may deal with that better for me & in spite of the fact that I don't know yet how the Imini stands up in different regards with the Soundlens... as I now have a surprising decision will need to be having a word with my Audiologist about the spec. with a view to trialing them paying little respect to my sentiments of needing to remain faithful to Starkey.

Believe me, I totally comprehend your yearning to shop and assess. I'm a buyer as well. Really what astonishes me is the manner by which frequently I see individuals settle on a choice for as much as $8,000 without looking, inquiring about web based, going to various experts and so forth. My entire profession I have truly been astonished at what number of individuals will meet me interestingly and two or after three hours, having done no other research, hand over a check or charge card for a large number of dollars.

Indeed, even now in the age of the Internet, I see individuals, much more youthful individuals, who simply come in, have a test, and drop a great many dollars. I could never dream of doing a wonder such as this myself, however hello, it makes my employment simpler!

Lately I am starting to see a couple of more sharp purchasers, and I'm certain the Internet will make more later on. Yet, I value being a specialist in my field, and of the hearing instruments I administer, so I am not anxious of an educated patient.

Initially Posted by dontay

Expectation every one of that bodes well... sorry on the off chance that we may contrast a bit yet in the event that you ever return to the UK & favor a stay in sunny Bournemouth...get in contact... I don't drive a Porsche however the house has a pool & it's a reasonable size!!! my significant other's a decent cook & the wines great excessively ... you'd be made extremely welcome

Much obliged to you for that stunning offer. I think Bournemouth is an extraordinary place. As a student my guide lived and worked there, and I spent numerous fun times taking in my exchange working with somebody I have tremendous regard for back in the mid 90s. I set out say despite everything I have a few patients living in Portsmouth, as I volunteered to cover that range for some time when a container went on take off. Yet, I lived and apportioned in the Bristol/Gloucestershire zone predominantly.

Anyway, while I would love to remain in Bournemouth, getting a charge out of the decent climate, and keeping away from the over estimated British lodgings, when my better half and I set out back to the UK we need to invest the majority of our energy going to my folks who tragically resigned to Yorkshire which let's be honest, is no Bournemouth!

dontay Originally Posted by ZCT

I don't know I was supporting for NO decision! Just proposing that a hearing proficient can just do as such much progressing preparing on top of maintaining his business and dealing with his patients. The more unique brands he tries to take in, the more he is probably going to miss the subtlety of a portion of the minor little programming eccentricities of every maker that may have the effect between cheerful patient and dismal patient.

Remember too that the more business he sends to one particular maker, the lower his discount costs are probably going to be, and the more the producer is probably going to hop when he gets the telephone.

In the event that I open a training tomorrow and stock five unique brands, sending them every one of the one request seven days, I will pay more for those guides, get less consideration from them when I call, and need to invest a greater amount of my energy attempting to find out about every item than if I managed only maybe a couple brands.

That is an expansive contrast for similar guides, yet there can be real explanations behind that, and not just about ripping individuals off.

On the off chance that I open a training tomorrow fitting three distinct producers, I will need to spend a fortune on promoting just to get my name out there. My absence of devotion to one maker (which you as a patient incline toward) is costing me in discount costs. Truth be told a portion of the projects that assistance me with promoting costs (for instance) may not be interested in me, hence guaranteeing more overheads. Possibly I employ better staff that cost more cash, that expenses as well.

Then again on the off chance that I have been doing business since 1973, and have a colossal referral base of upbeat patients sending me business, I've gotten comfortable with two producers and send the vast majority of my business to one of them, I am getting value breaks like insane from the essential maker, my publicizing spending plan can be littler in light of the fact that I am "known" in the town. Perhaps my office is purchased and paid for by at that point. Possibly my better half is the assistant, and we simply remove a joint pay from the business which is not as much as employing an outsider. See the distinction?

What's more, the thing is, not at all like items like the iPhone, we are not talking a huge number of items sold. A bustling fruitful portable hearing assistant practice with one hearing proficient may just offer 10-20 units in seven days. It could be less evidently.

So there should be sufficient benefit in only 5-10 deals in seven days to pay for all the staff, overheads, publicizing, and individual compensation. And additionally enough benefit to keep the business going and deal with existing patients. Once in a while do hearing focuses charge for a hearing test, and there is typically just an ostensible markup on embellishments like batteries. Individuals hope to return again and again for alterations, cleaning, adjusting, re-testing, re-programming and so forth.

Main concern here is that I consciously submit to you that and also I know the business, the person charging £900 more is not scamming you, he is basically in a better place than the less expensive person. Furthermore, it isn't really the case that purchasing from him would be an oversight.

I've known a great deal of allocators throughout the years, I've most likely met hundreds here in the US and back there in the UK when I worked there. They weren't driving Porsches, living in chateaus and wearing Rolex watches. The great ones I've seen make a better than expected living somewhere close to an instructor and dental practitioner. Albeit many make not as much as that.

Regardless, it's incredible that you found a decent person who is functioning admirably with you. That is the ticket in this industry.

Hello there ZTC, simply need to state leading that I have each reverence for you all, particularly after my encounters!!! (& not only the sound I'm seeing right now) THAT'S unquestionably guaranteed! Likewise the way you've set out & clarified the business is enormous excessively & I question anybody could contend with the expenses & challenges of maintaining an expert business. Much obliged to you for all that & trust that one day you WILL have the capacity to bear the cost of a house, drive a Porsche & wear a Rolex!! However, yes, I can see that there will be fetched contrasts between various organizations, contingent upon a wide range of things yet regardless I say that a £900 distinction for one guide is certain going a few! I would have believed that any individual who invests a small piece of energy doing some essential research isn't eagerly going to pay THAT kind of distinction... yet, I assume it takes different kinds to make a world & possibly somebody who lives in manor wouldn't stress over it!

Interestingly enough the top value I was cited really originated from what is presumably the greatest, most seasoned & understood (surely by the more seasoned era) chain in the UK. In light of the all out "crusade" adverts in the national press each month they MUST have a tremendous promoting spending plan! I'm perplexed I concluded that I'm not going to be the trick that compensation's for it!! The least expensive quote I had was likewise from a mainstream store (however possessed by Starkey!) My audiologist (free) couldn't exactly coordinate it yet cited a cost at the lower end of the scale... I chose to pay more basically to have the advantage of totally autonomous aptitude & no dedication to a specific producer! That was presumably an awful cost choice on my part however the person IS extraordinary so no issue!

With respect to the "decision" issue... I know you're by and by one-sided towards Starkey & genuinely make no mystery of that.. & I've absolutely had first rate benefit from them, that is without a doubt! I CAN see your point from a 'value break' supply & request see however (dependably a yet!) as a client I would be thinking about whether I had gotten the best guide for my conditions or on the off chance that I had passed up a major opportunity for something better on the grounds that my decisions had been limited to just two or three producers. For example Siemens have now turned out with the main genuine (up 'til now) rivalry for the Soundlens IIC... I'm trialing the Soundlens right now & in spite of the fact that my waterways are fine for IIC's I just barely make it in the decibel misfortune stakes & so need to endure the resulting input issues... in the event that I need IIC's. Starkey & Siemens both claim to have the honey bees knees in best input administration. I now HAVE to consider if the Imini may deal with that better for me & in spite of the fact that I don't know yet how the Imini stands up in different regards with the Soundlens... as I now have a startling decision will need to be having a word with my Audiologist about the spec. with a view to trialing them paying little respect to my sentiments of needing to remain faithful to Starkey. Expectation every one of that bodes well... sorry on the off chance that we may contrast a bit however in the event that you ever return to the UK & favor a stay in sunny Bournemouth...get in contact... I don't drive a Porsche however the house has a pool & it's a reasonable size!!! my significant other's a decent cook & the wines great excessively ... you'd be made exceptionally welcome

ZCT Originally Posted by dontay

Much obliged to you for your remarks. I can see your point about handyman & ace of none! However, I'm not SURE!? How might we get on the off chance that we had no way out?

I don't know I was upholding for NO decision! Simply recommending that a hearing proficient can just do as such much progressing preparing on top of maintaining his business and dealing with his patients. The more extraordinary brands he tries to take in, the more he is probably going to miss the subtlety of a portion of the small little programming characteristics of every producer that may have the effect between cheerful patient and tragic patient.

Remember too that the more business he sends to one particular maker, the lower his discount costs are probably going to be, and the more the producer is probably going to bounce when he grabs the telephone.

In the event that I open a training tomorrow and stock five distinct brands, sending them every one of the one request seven days, I will pay more for those guides, get less consideration from them when I call, and need to invest a greater amount of my energy attempting to find out about every item than if I managed only maybe a couple brands.

Initially Posted by dontay

DO concur that shabby may not be the best and I absolutely comprehend what you say in regards to 'on-expenses' however when you consider that Starkey Otolens/Soundlens costs that I was cited gone from £1800 each to £2700 each (and I require TWO!!)forgive me for expressing the conspicuous yet THAT'S a distinction of £900 PER aid!!!for the SAME guides!! Too bad... be that as it may, there is my modest supposition.. "regardless of how you cut it"... some tearing of going on! Or, on the other hand a few spots have ghastly on-costs!!

That is a substantial distinction for similar guides, however there can be honest to goodness explanations behind that, and not just about ripping individuals off.

In the event that I open a training tomorrow fitting three unique makers, I will need to spend a fortune on publicizing just to get my name out there. My absence of dedication to one producer (which you as a patient lean toward) is costing me in discount costs. Actually a portion of the projects that assistance me with publicizing costs (for instance) may not be interested in me, accordingly guaranteeing more overheads. Perhaps I procure better staff that cost more cash, that expenses as well.

On the other hand on the off chance that I have been doing business since 1973, and have an immense referral base of cheerful patients sending me business, I've gotten comfortable with two producers and send the greater part of my business to one of them, I am getting value breaks like insane from the essential maker, my publicizing spending plan can be littler in light of the fact that I am "known" in the town. Perhaps my office is purchased and paid for by at that point. Possibly my significant other is the secretary, and we simply remove a joint compensation from the business which is not as much as employing an outsider. See the distinction?

Furthermore, the thing is, not at all like items like the iPhone, we are not talking a large number of items sold. A bustling fruitful amplifier hone with one hearing proficient may just offer 10-20 units in seven days. It could be less obviously.

So there should be sufficient benefit in only 5-10 deals in seven days to pay for all the staff, overheads, promoting, and individual compensation. And also enough benefit to keep the business going and deal with existing patients. Infrequently do hearing focuses charge for a hearing test, and there is typically just an ostensible markup on frill like batteries. Individuals hope to return again and again for alterations, cleaning, overhauling, re-testing, re-programming and so forth.

Primary concern here is that I deferentially submit to you that and I know the business, the person charging £900 more is not scamming you, he is essentially in a better place than the less expensive person. Furthermore, it isn't really the case that purchasing from him would be a mix-up.

I've known a great deal of containers throughout the years, I've most likely met hundreds here in the US and back there in the UK when I worked there. They weren't driving Porsches, living in chateaus and wearing Rolex watches. The great ones I've seen make a better than expected living somewhere close to an educator and dental practitioner. Albeit many make not as much as that.

Regardless, it's awesome that you found a decent person who is functioning admirably with you. That is the ticket in this industry.

wutzizname Thanks for posting, Malatesta. Anticipate catching wind of your experience.

Malatesta I'm 28, and I've been wearing amplifiers since I was 3. I have around a 60db misfortune in the low mid frequencies in both ears. I wore Starkeys when I was more youthful, however I've been wearing Siemens CICs since 2001, and while going into the audiologist this week for new portable hearing assistant talks I was persuaded to experiment with the Otolens. They've been requested and are en route. I'll give my own audit about my involvement with them when they come in.

I have unexpected sound needs in comparison to many people as I do work with live sound and I like a guide that most precisely and normally creates the genuine sound with negligible preparing impacts. The way that they are nearer to the eardrum is the thing that sold me, not by any means on a perceivability point of view, yet only that in principle they'll ideally simply enable me to hear somewhat more actually; I needn't bother with any favor directional mics or anything.

I've been content with the Siemens sound quality in the guides I've worn so we'll perceive how distinctive these are. The CICs I wear are pretty dang little as of now so I'm interested to see exactly how much little these Otolenses are.

dr.amy Originally Posted by jpmar

Howdy Dontay,

My remark was not alluding to your post but rather to Dr.Amy's 03/08 caricatural remark on Siemens purportedly poorer input dismissal than Oticon's or Phonak's:Siemens Pure??? Not barely - unless he enjoys tuning in to a consistent sharp feedback...Sorry that my Q-Reply couldn't be posted after his own message which I ought to have obviously cited.

Concerning criticism dismissal buildups from listening device makers, I concur with you that their answers are not full evidence but rather they surely have any kind of effect, to a limited degree. On the off chance that you request outrageous intensification, the shorter the separation between the receiver and the speaker, the more input will be an issue whatever one does to avert it. All the more so with CIC helps.

Well with the Siemens Pure 700 line of innovation, it wasn't a caricatural remark however actuality in view of fitting numerous a hefty portion of them and sacrificing addition to acheive criticism free fittings. On the off chance that you see, my remark was in august of 2010 and I was not fitting the 701 line of helps like you have. The 701 line of helps does in truth have a superior input cancelation calculation than their past endeavor.

Are there input free guides for huge misfortunes - NO. Do a few producers show improvement over others - YES.

Be that as it may, I;m not in any case beyond any doubt in case I'm citing and answering to the correct individual - now I'm confounded

dr. amy

dontay Originally Posted by jpmar

Howdy Dontay,

My remark was not alluding to your post but rather to Dr.Amy's 03/08 caricatural remark on Siemens purportedly poorer criticism dismissal than Oticon's or Phonak's:Siemens Pure??? Not barely - unless he enjoys tuning in to a steady piercing criticism... Sorry that my Q-Reply couldn't be posted after his own message which I ought to have obviously cited.

Concerning input dismissal buildups from amplifier producers, I concur with you that their answers are not full evidence but rather they unquestionably have any kind of effect, to a limited degree. On the off chance that you request extraordinary enhancement, the shorter the separation between the mouthpiece and the speaker, the more input will be an issue whatever one does to anticipate it. All the more so with CIC helps.

Hey JPMAR,

Don't worry about it, I get confounded by a portion of the strings! It seems to me however why it's essential to trial as wide a range scope of produces as could be expected under the circumstances. The open deliberation between yourself & dr.amy does rather show up that what one individual discovers alright another finds unsatisfactory, even between individuals with a similar misfortune. It's likely that your BOTH right. I assume it comes down to the way that in the event that it makes you happy at that point put it all on the line!! Great you've discovered guides that that your content with & works for you. Salud.

jpmar Hi Dontay,

My remark was not alluding to your post but rather to Dr.Amy's 03/08 caricatural remark on Siemens professedly poorer input dismissal than Oticon's or Phonak's:Siemens Pure??? Not barely - unless he enjoys tuning in to a steady piercing input... Sorry that my Q-Reply couldn't be posted after his own particular message which I ought to have obviously cited.

Concerning criticism dismissal buildups from portable amplifier makers, I concur with you that their answers are not full evidence but rather they absolutely have any kind of effect, to a limited degree. In the event that you request outrageous intensification, the shorter the separation between the amplifier and the speaker, the more input will be an issue whatever one does to avoid it. All the more so with CIC helps.

dontay Originally Posted by jpmar

My involvement with Siemens 701 does not connect with your affirmation.

I have no input issue with my Pure 701 BTE RIC (with the littlest open arches) even on the music program where criticism plug has been turned totally off. Alright my listening ability misfortune is not awful but rather regardless of the possibility that I container my hands on my ears, there is no criticism with the exception of on the off chance that I get the volume to most extreme where input at long last traverses. I trailed Oticon Agile and Phonak Smart III and neither performed better on criticism dismissal.

Hello, happy you don't endure input issues! However, the point I was attempting to make is that individuals that are at the more serious end of the hearing misfortune scale constantly DO have input DESPITE makers terms like Siemens 'criticism plug' & Starkey's 'Unadulterated Waveform Eliminator'. Every one of them have extremely excellent sci-fi sounding names for their calculations yet nobody so far can honestly guarantee that input has been ELIMINATED! Due to the nature & material science of reflected sound waves I question they ever will!! Be that as it may, anybody new to the amusement wouldn't understand it. Desires of individuals at the direct to extreme end at that point transform into dissatisfaction essentially on account of producers buildup! I expect you don't experience the ill effects of the issue since you needn't bother with your additions set at larger amounts, even on your maximum general volume setting. I think the principle point to acknowledge is that listening devices are quite recently that... a guide & an assistance, not a cure! I simply wish the makes buildup & "bumf" would make that point clear as opposed to focusing on making the point that their specific guides are the puppy mutts privates of every portable hearing assistant!!

jpmar My involvement with Siemens 701 does not relate with your affirmation.

I have no input issue with my Pure 701 BTE RIC (with the littlest open arches) even on the music program where criticism plug has been turned totally off. Alright my listening ability misfortune is not awful but rather regardless of the possibility that I glass my hands on my ears, there is no criticism with the exception of on the off chance that I get the volume to greatest where input at long last gets past. I trailed Oticon Agile and Phonak Smart III and neither performed better on input dismissal.

dontay Originally Posted by ZCT

Exceptionally fascinating data. My supervisor used to live in Bournemouth when I initially qualified, and he was an extraordinary tutor. I have affectionate recollections of going down there for preparing visits on many events. I've additionally been to the Starkey lab in the north, in actuality I am still every so often in contact with the rep there, who has worked there for a long time!

I have several remarks on what you composed. To begin with, modest is not generally great. For the most part when you purchase portable hearing assistants, a portion of the cash goes to the lab, some goes to pay the hearing proficient, some pays for the overheads, some pays for the administrations you get, and some goes to the proprietors/shareholders.

That condition is an unavoidable reality. Regardless of how you cut it, each portable amplifier center has a hearing proficient, overheads, administrations for you, and a proprietor who needs an arrival on his speculation. Each guide sold must be acquired from the lab. So on that premise I stress over the least expensive apportioning workplaces. My worry is the place that sparing is originating from, in light of the fact that it must be from one of those regions I just specified.

In the most ideal situation the center is doing as such well through informal exchange that their publicizing spending plan is insignificant, and through shear volume of offers they can be shoddy. At that point if the proprietor is additionally the container, that spares some more cash.

My second remark on what you said is in regards to the diverse producers. Unless you are a national organization, you are continually going to show signs of improvement discount costs in the event that you offer more volume or go into a restrictive plan with a producer. So in the event that you just have a few workplaces and purchase from four unique manufacturing plants, at that point you won't be on their superior discount costs.

Additionally, on the off chance that you are managing say four makers, it is far-fetched that you will have the capacity to take in each and every characteristic, eccentricity, and trap for each and every model of each and every item that you offer. It is improbable that you will be ready to go to item courses and preparing for each and every producer.

So from a purchaser stance, having more decision may appear to be incredible, yet I stress that a hearing proficient that offers excessively decision is not ready to ace each and every item that he gives.

However, those are recently my remarks. In spite of what I have stated, I am satisfied you have discovered a trustworthy and top notch hearing proficient to benefit your listening ability needs. Good fortunes!

Much obliged to you for your remarks. I can see your point about handyman & ace of none! Be that as it may, I'm not SURE!? How might we get on in the event that we had no way out? With so MUCH decision & ALSO such a great amount of buildup from maker's (which I think raise desires to a nonsensical abnormal state!) how would we investigate or discover which is best for our listening ability misfortune? I've attempted Siemens, Widex, Oticon & Starkey helps throughout the years, I for the most part refresh around each 4/5 years to exploit the most recent (asserted) increments in innovation & they ALL have extraordinary sci-fi sounding "bits" in them... be that as it may, I do ponder! They ALL claim to guarantee you hear discourse in boisterous environment, (they DON'T.. they HELP!)they all claim to have dispensed with input (they DON'T... unless you needn't bother with much pick up) and so forth and so forth. as of not long ago they all asserted that CIC helps were for all intents and purposes undetectable... (I assume they are if your visually impaired and in addition hard of hearing... I better not say idiotic!) Surly the special case who can enable us to deal with the decisions is an accomplished audiologist with an extensive variety of information of what's around available additionally can trust & are OK with. Additionally when another item (illustration IIC helps & bluetooth items) go onto the market then audiologists are on a significant expectation to absorb information too. More than anything I might suspect it's TEAMWORK, you & your audiologist cooperating gets the best outcomes! DO concur that shoddy may not be the best and I surely comprehend what you say in regards to 'on-expenses' yet when you consider that Starkey Otolens/Soundlens costs that I was cited gone from £1800 each to £2700 each (and I require TWO!!)forgive me for expressing the conspicuous however THAT'S a distinction of £900 PER aid!!!for the SAME guides!! Too bad... in any case, there is my modest feeling.. "regardless of how you cut it"... some tearing of going on! Or, on the other hand a few spots have unpleasant on-costs!! Be that as it may, yes, I do comprehend the point you made... also, as in every way, modest doesn't really mean great, however it IS conceivable... in the event that individuals would just treat looking for the correct guides for their listening ability misfortune as a medium term extend... to get a Rolls Royce benefit at a Mini Minor cost!!! P.S. I paid £2000 each... not the least expensive quote I had but rather I'm certainly getting a Rolls Royce benefit... I'm 7 months into my 30 day trial!! 4 revamps!!! & they have liaised intimately with Starkey to attempt to sort my fit/input issues AND audiologist tossed in an additional 4 years guarantee!!! I ponder what benefit I would have had on the off chance that I'd acknowledged the principal cite I had. (£2,700 each!!! PHEW!!!) Best respects, Don

ZCT Originally Posted by dontay

Howdy, I live on the south drift in Bournemouth, Dorset in the UK, Starkey's processing plant is in the north of England in Cheshire close Manchester, a separation of around 250 miles. Not at all like most HA "shops" which some place out of sight in the event that you check sufficiently far are partnered or diversified from a noteworthy producer my audiologist is totally autonomous and just arrangements and represents considerable authority in premium level and accordingly costly advanced portable hearing assistants. They forbid HA's from every one of the universes significant producers and value shrewd they can't be beaten. Trust me... I've attempted!!! The organizations name is "Digitone" there are just two branches which are both neighborhood to my region. On the off chance that YOU live in the UK then I trust that data makes a difference... on the off chance that you live anyplace close Dorset then you just won't locate a superior organization to manage, in addition to they have absolutely current reason manufactured branches, exceptionally experienced and have been doing business for a long time... I've required HA's for around 40 years... Iv'e looked at different organizations on the circumstances that I have refreshed only just because more than anything... I've never been reluctant to get cites... be that as it may, nobody else has ever even approached! So there you go... I can't applaud them profoundly enough. Seek all that possibly of assistance after yourself or any other person and very cheerful to answer whatever other inquiries regarding my practicable encounters with the Otolens. Best respects, Don.

Exceptionally fascinating data. My manager used to live in Bournemouth when I initially qualified, and he was an incredible coach. I have affectionate recollections of going down there for preparing visits on many events. I've additionally been to the Starkey lab in the north, in actuality I am still periodically in contact with the rep there, who has worked there for a long time!

I have a few remarks on what you composed. To begin with, shoddy is not generally great. For the most part when you purchase listening devices, a portion of the cash goes to the lab, some goes to pay the hearing proficient, some pays for the overheads, some pays for the administrations you get, and some goes to the proprietors/shareholders.

That condition is an unavoidable reality. Regardless of how you cut it, each portable amplifier center has a hearing proficient, overheads, administrations for you, and a proprietor who needs an arrival on his speculation. Each guide sold must be obtained from the lab. So on that premise I stress over the least expensive apportioning workplaces. My worry is the place that sparing is originating from, in light of the fact that it must be from one of those regions I just said.

In the most ideal situation the facility is doing as such well through verbal exchange that their publicizing spending plan is insignificant, and through shear volume of offers they can be modest. At that point if the proprietor is additionally the gadget, that spares some more cash.

My second remark on what you said is in regards to the distinctive producers. Unless you are a national organization, you are continually going to show signs of improvement discount costs in the event that you offer more volume or go into a restrictive plan with a maker. So in the event that you just have two or three workplaces and purchase from four unique manufacturing plants, at that point you won't be on their top notch discount costs.

Likewise, in the event that you are managing say four makers, it is far-fetched that you will have the capacity to take in each and every characteristic, quirk, and trap for each and every model of each and every item that you offer. It is improbable that you will be ready to go to item courses and preparing for each and every producer.

So from a shopper point of view, having more decision may appear to be extraordinary, yet I stress that a hearing proficient that offers excessively decision is not ready to ace each and every item that he gives.

In any case, those are quite recently my remarks. In spite of what I have stated, I am satisfied you have discovered a trustworthy and top notch hearing proficient to benefit your listening ability needs. Good fortunes!

ZCT Originally Posted by skunker

The Bad:

- First time it was somewhat agonizing in my correct ear. Couldn't open jaw the distance without uneasiness.

- About $3500 a piece (x2 for both ears )

- Cant' appear to get the T2 work (volume/memory control by means of PDA) to work yet....but I have an appt with my audi in around 1 week, so we'll investigate at that point.

Ensure the T2 has been exchanged on. A great deal of gadgets don't push this component and turn it off, so do converse with them about that!

In the event that you have an iPhone there is an application that works incredible for T2.

Concerning the solace issue, they can work with you on that, yet you are directly down in the hard piece of the ear trench, which is the cost you've paid for that imperceptible look. They can likely move it somewhat farther of the ear for more solace, obviously it won't be very as undetectable.

dr.amy Originally Posted by Noreg

A debt of gratitude is in order for the answer! I got my audiogram sendt from my audiologist two or three days back, however I don't understeand what it says. To make it straightforward; in light of this outline, is the soundlens something for my hearingloss?

beyond any doubt is

dr.amy

Um bongo Originally Posted by dontay

Howdy, I live on the south drift in Bournemouth, Dorset in the UK, Starkey's industrial facility is in the north of England in Cheshire close Manchester, a separation of around 250 miles. Not at all like most HA "shops" which some place out of sight in the event that you check sufficiently far are partnered or diversified from a noteworthy maker my audiologist is totally autonomous and just arrangements and has some expertise in premium level and in this way costly computerized portable amplifiers. They forbid HA's from every one of the universes significant producers and value shrewd they can't be beaten. Trust me... I've attempted!!! The organizations name is "Digitone" there are just two branches which are both nearby to my territory. On the off chance that YOU live in the UK then I trust that data makes a difference... in the event that you live anyplace close Dorset then you just won't locate a superior organization to manage, in addition to they have absolutely present day reason assembled branches, extremely experienced and have been doing business for a long time... I've required HA's for around 40 years... Iv'e looked at different organizations on the circumstances that I have refreshed only for giggles more than anything... I've never been reluctant to get cites... in any case, nobody else has ever even approached! So there you go... I can't adulate them exceptionally enough. Seek all that perhaps of assistance after yourself or any other individual and very upbeat to answer whatever other inquiries concerning my practicable encounters with the Otolens. Best respects, Don.

There are many of us independents, not simply Glen.

Noreg Originally Posted by dr.amy

I concur with Um Bongo. Numerous patients have had unwavering quality issues with the BE, and their remote mic CIC is really a vastly improved item from Resound. As Um Bongo said, it truly depends on your trenches. My figure be that as it may, is that if a BE will fit that profoundly in our ear, that an OtoLens (SoundLens) would likewise. I have OtoLens made to fit my ears yet the BE scarcely fits in my ear by any means.

Good fortunes!

dr. amy

A debt of gratitude is in order for the answer! I got my audiogram sendt from my audiologist two or three days back, yet I don't understeand what it says. To make it straightforward; in view of this outline, is the soundlens something for my hearingloss?

skunker hey wutzizname, your audiologist ought to have the capacity to give you a couple of advantages with the buy of the Otolens, similar to 2 year guarantee, 30/90 day discount, and so on. For me, they simply continued working with me until the point when we got the fit right. They need to be content with the Otolens as much as you do.

dontay Hi, I live on the south drift in Bournemouth, Dorset in the UK, Starkey's manufacturing plant is in the north of England in Cheshire close Manchester, a separation of around 250 miles. Dissimilar to most HA "shops" which some place out of sight on the off chance that you check sufficiently far are associated or diversified from a noteworthy maker my audiologist is totally autonomous and just arrangements and represents considerable authority in premium level and in this manner costly computerized amplifiers. They forbid HA's from every one of the universes real producers and value savvy they essentially can't be beaten. Trust me... I've attempted!!! The organizations name is "Digitone" there are just two branches which are both nearby to my range. On the off chance that YOU live in the UK then I trust that data makes a difference... in the event that you live anyplace close Dorset then you basically won't locate a superior organization to manage, in addition to they have absolutely current reason constructed branches, extremely experienced and have been doing business for a long time... I've required HA's for around 40 years... Iv'e looked at different organizations on the circumstances that I have refreshed only because of the price of tea in China more than anything... I've never been reluctant to get cites... be that as it may, nobody else has ever even approached! So there you go... I can't commend them sufficiently very. Seek all that perhaps of assistance after yourself or any other person and very glad to answer whatever other inquiries regarding my practicable encounters with the Otolens. Best respects, Don.

wutzizname Thank you, Dontay, for the considerable report. Mooched to hear that you're having input issues that way, however extremely energized by how tirelessly your Audiologist and the Starkey people are attempting to work through them. That certainly gives me more prominent trust in giving them a shot myself.

Kindly do keep on reporting back as your advance proceeds.

Likewise, would you mind sharing where in the nation (or the world?) you're found. Inquisitive about where the Starkey group is going from and how far. What's more, on the shot that you're in my neighborhood (or if nothing else for other people who are) I'd love to know who your audiologist is. Sounds like he's extremely dedicated to critical thinking, and to the SoundLens specifically. In case you're happy with sharing his contact data or connection to his site, I think it would be an important referral.

Much appreciated!

dontay I've been trialing two Otolens since last August and have experienced very serious input issues (I get criticism from no perceivable reason even in complete hush with no head development) however have only acclaim for the way Starkey have approached attempting to determine the issues I have encountered. Clearly my ear waterways go exceptionally limit rapidly and it is suspected that is bringing about rather terrible fit and this is causing input. In conjunction with my audiologist and Starkey we are in truth STILL attempting to determine the probs!!

My first set were come back to Starkey because of the criticism probs and were come back to me with a connected delicate covering yet at the same time had the input probs! Starkey at that point made two totally new guides yet from the first impressions (I was permitted to keep the delicate covered guides while this was done) yet tragically input was as yet an issue!! Starkey at that point asked for my audiologist to establish new connections thus they could make two more guides!! Two delegates from Starkey at that point really flew down to my range with the new guides and fitted and set them up and approached me the attempt them for two or three weeks. It turned out to be instantly evident that there had been a slight change in the left guide help however no distinction in the correct one... at that point inside 3 days the correct one surrendered the phantom totally!! It just passed on!! Off it backpedaled to Starkey for repair yet it was currently just before Christmas so there was a break for occasions before I got it back! It returned repaired additionally with a can situate sort cover over the speaker vent. Lamentably NO distinction or change with the input however!!! My audiologist at that point reached me preceding my next meeting with him and educated me that Starkey needed to fly down to go to that arrangement and needed to establish two new connections themselves since they were resolved to get the fit right!!

That is the stage I'm at now, I've met them once more, they have taken two new impressions and I'm anticipating entry of two more! One thing is without a doubt... I'm a specialist at having impressions done!!

YES it might turn out that the issues are difficult to determine and YES it's been an exceptionally disappointing time... however, WOW! What commitment from my audiologist and what an administration from Starkey! They have both expressed that they are resolved not to be beaten by my moronic molded ear trenches!! I'm seeking as significantly after THEIR purpose as much as my own particular that they succeed!! I'll lettcha know how I get on! By-the - way... I'm told I have genuinely extreme misfortune in both ears, something I definitely knew, however the Otolens (when not causing criticism) are enormous as far as I can tell... a huge change in my capacity to hear close by the sacred chalice... imperceptibility!!! Wear.

dr.amy Originally Posted by Um bongo

Starkey tends to isolate feeling among gadgets (even on here ). In general they are a decent bundle and on the off chance that you need to have an Otolens/Soundlens don't be put off. However any profound fitted CIC has disappointment potential (come back to Manufacturer) of in the vicinity of 10 and 17 times that of the identical RIC show - however the Otolens may have preferable individual figures over this.

In the event that you can live with that and welcome that occasionally you should go to the Audiologist's office to get it overhauled or sent back to the maker, at that point there's no issue.

One other potential pit-fall is bid - not every person is appropriate, and regardless of the possibility that they are settling such a profound fit can be troublesome. Be that as it may, you won't locate that out until the point that you attempt one

Couldn't have said it better myself

Um bongo Originally Posted by wutzizname

Howdy All.

Reposting my inquiry from a string in the Published Articles area with expectations of getting more reaction...

Imperceptibility is a tremendous issue for me. So I was exceptionally energized when I initially found out about the Otolens (now called SoundLens). In any case, when I got some information about the Otolens, she revealed to me that regardless of the restorative advantages, she has had such awful encounters with Starkey as a rule (as far as item breakdowns, and repair benefit, I trust) that she never again fits any of their items.

I was quite frustrated.

So I'm thinking about whether any other individual, especially different audiologists here, have comparable conclusions/experiences...with the Otolens/SoundLens specifically or potentially Starkey when all is said in done? Else, I can't resist the urge to think about whether maybe my audiologist has some different reasons (individual or budgetary) not to prescribe Starkey?

I like my audiologist, a great deal, yet in the event that SoundLens is the item for me and she's not open to fitting it, I may need to go elsewhere.

Would likewise love to know whether anybody has data on if-and-when different producers might be turning out with comparative IIC models?

Much obliged to such an extent!

Starkey tends to partition feeling among allocators (even on here ). All in all they are a decent pack and on the off chance that you need to have an Otolens/Soundlens don't be put off. However any profound fitted CIC has disappointment potential (come back to Manufacturer) of in the vicinity of 10 and 17 times that of the proportional RIC display - however the Otolens may have preferred individual figures over this.

In the event that you can live with that and value that now and again you should go to the Audiologist's office to get it adjusted or sent back to the producer, at that point there's no issue.

One other potential pit-fall is appointment - not every person is appropriate, and regardless of the possibility that they are settling such a profound fit can be troublesome. Nonetheless, you won't locate that out until the point that you attempt one

wutzizname Hi All.

Reposting my inquiry from a string in the Published Articles segment with expectations of getting more reaction...

Intangibility is a tremendous issue for me. So I was exceptionally energized when I initially caught wind of the Otolens (now called SoundLens). In any case, when I got some information about the Otolens, she disclosed to me that regardless of the restorative advantages, she has had such terrible encounters with Starkey all in all (as far as item breakdowns, and repair benefit, I trust) that she never again fits any of their items.

I was truly frustrated.

So I'm thinking about whether any other individual, especially different audiologists here, have comparable assessments/experiences...with the Otolens/SoundLens specifically and additionally Starkey by and large? Else, I can't resist the urge to think about whether maybe my audiologist has some different reasons (individual or budgetary) not to suggest Starkey?

I like my audiologist, a ton, however in the event that SoundLens is the item for me and she's not happy with fitting it, I may need to go elsewhere.

Would likewise love to know whether anybody has data on if-and-when different producers might be turning out with comparative IIC models?

Much appreciated to such an extent!

dr.amy I concur with Um Bongo. Numerous patients have had unwavering quality issues with the BE, and their remote mic CIC is really a greatly improved item from Resound. As Um Bongo said, it truly depends on your waterways. My figure nonetheless, is that if a BE will fit that profoundly in our ear, that an OtoLens (SoundLens) would likewise. I have OtoLens made to fit my ears however the BE scarcely fits in my ear by any means.

Good fortunes!

dr. amy

Um bongo Originally Posted by Noreg

I havent saw anything, yet I am not content with them since i think the clamor lessening is a long way from adequate. When i utilize them in a noisy enviroment with many individuals talking in the meantime + different clamors it is extremely troublesome for me to understeand what individuals are stating. Do you have any encounters with the otolens help versus "be by resonate" by they way it sifting the sound and keep through the noice? I likewise have issue to understeand what individuals are stating in greater gatherings, as classmeetings ect. Perhaps its insufficient yield control for my hearingloss.. Ideally the otolens will work better as they goes significantly more profound into the ear waterway, difficult to tell.. I think i will get them an attempt, just issue is that they are not bolstered by the protection here in norway so i should pay it from my own particular pocket pluss If im not content with them regardless I should pay a quite huge measure of cash when i convey them back

As far as execution, I don't know whether anyone has attempted the two next to each other, especailly as they are very extraordinary items. The more affordable variants of Otolens (Sound focal point) ought to give some better checked examinations. Be that as it may it truly all relies upon the state of your ear waterway and level of misfortune to work out in the event that you are reasonable.

Noreg I havent saw anything, yet I am not content with them since i think the clamor lessening is a long way from adequate. When i utilize them in a noisy enviroment with many individuals talking in the meantime + different clamors it is exceptionally troublesome for me to understeand what individuals are stating. Do you have any encounters with the otolens help versus "be by resonate" by they way it sifting the sound and keep through the noice? I likewise have issue to understeand what individuals are stating in greater gatherings, as classmeetings ect. Perhaps its insufficient yield control for my hearingloss.. Ideally the otolens will work better as they goes much more profound into the ear trench, hard to tell.. I think i will get them an attempt, just issue is that they are not bolstered by the protection here in norway so i should pay it from my own pocket pluss If im not content with them regardless I should pay a truly huge measure of cash when i convey them back

Um bongo Originally Posted by Noreg

Hello everyone! I'm a 20 year old portable hearing assistant client from Norway, i've been staying nearby the gathering for some time simply taking a gander at various strings. Right now I utilize "be by reverberate" portable hearing assistants. For me the intangibility is critical, and I that is the reason I think the otolens appears to be intriguing. Yet, I have been told from my audiologist that my ear channel are very little, so I am a little interested about how far the otolens will go into my ear trenches. The "be by resonate" goes quite far, its practically undetectable, the main thing you can see is the "tube" with the mouthpiece at last that leaves the gadget.

Respects from Norway

Any dependability issues yet? It's an awesome sounding guide, however we have had various disappointments here of both the mic tubing and the beneficiary decreasing in affectability. Generally begins to occur from around 6-9months in.

Sorry to learn negative about what ought to have been an extraordinary item.

Noreg Hey everyone! I'm a 20 year old portable hearing assistant client from Norway, i've been staying nearby the discussion for some time simply taking a gander at various strings. Right now I utilize "be by reverberate" listening devices. For me the intangibility is imperative, and I that is the reason I think the otolens appears to be fascinating. However, I have been told from my audiologist that my ear waterway are very little, so I am a little interested about how far the otolens will go into my ear channels. The "be by reverberate" goes entirely far, its practically imperceptible, the main thing you can see is the "tube" with the mouthpiece at last that leaves the gadget.

Respects from Norway

Neilk Bernaus, I can't answer your inquiries, not comfortable with those items. Be that as it may, I simply needed to state that your English is okay. Your inquiries are eloquent and straightforward. Welcome to the area.

bernaus Originally Posted by wongtmn

My inquiries are

1) I read in an article that air vents lessen impediment yet in the relinquish of sound quality. Would half be able to vents be made in the otolens? Would it be a good idea for us to make vents for otolens? My audi proposed to make a vent on the external surface of the shell, will it work?

2) Since the otolens is not totally in the second twisted, what's the advantage of otolens versus an IQ S11 CIC given that the 2 utilize a similar chip? Shouldn't I remain with the IQ S11 which is substantially less expensive?

Howdy all, i

dr.amy Originally Posted by skunker

hello folks, am refresh now that I have had them for a couple of months.

I like them. They do enhance my listening ability. I'm likewise observing a language instructor and I have seen I would now be able to hear the "sh" and "s" frequencies, because of the Otolens. Despite everything I experience some difficulty with motion pictures and discourse in occupied and uproarious conditions (eateries, bars, and so on). Have a few issues with hearing in autos, however it has enhanced a bit.

The correct guide has a tendency to gradually slide/stand out as the day advances, and I regularly need to utilize my pinky to drive it back in. Will see about completing another ear shape.

I'm additionally no longer unsure about these things and I jump at the chance to indicate them off to individuals. Nobody sees I wear them (in the event that they do, they haven't said anything). I've dated a larger number of ladies in 3 months than I did in 3 years, lol. Self-assurance makes a difference!

Happy with them? Yes. Is it true that they are justified regardless of the stunning $7k? I figure they are on account of there is nothing else out there to contrast it with. To be completely forthright, I'd pay substantially more in the event that they can reestablish my hearing....but lets not hop the firearm yet. I think some astounding HA innovation is on the horizon....looking forward to it. We require more rivalry and help from therapeutic protection partnerships to enable us to pay for these things.

I'm happy they are working out for you! Particularly since I at first idea they wouldn't give you enough pick up. You may need to change your profile name to "Ladykiller"

dr. amy

skunker hey folks, am refresh now that I have had them for a couple of months.

I like them. They do enhance my listening ability. I'm likewise observing a language teacher and I have seen I would now be able to hear the "sh" and "s" frequencies, on account of the Otolens. Despite everything I experience some difficulty with motion pictures and discourse in occupied and uproarious conditions (eateries, bars, and so forth). Have a few issues with hearing in autos, however it has enhanced a bit.

The correct guide has a tendency to gradually slide/stand out as the day advances, and I frequently need to utilize my pinky to drive it back in. Will see about completing another ear form.

I'm additionally no longer reluctant about these things and I jump at the chance to demonstrate them off to individuals. Nobody sees I wear them (on the off chance that they do, they haven't said anything). I've dated a bigger number of ladies in 3 months than I did in 3 years, lol. Self-assurance makes a difference!

Happy with them? Yes. It is safe to say that they are justified regardless of the amazing $7k? I figure they are on account of there is nothing else out there to contrast it with. To be completely forthright, I'd pay substantially more on the off chance that they can reestablish my hearing....but lets not bounce the firearm yet. I think some astonishing HA innovation is on the horizon....looking forward to it. We require more rivalry and help from therapeutic protection partnerships to enable us to pay for these things.

sifromleeds I got groove vents made in the principal match I got which appeared to help with the impediment.

sifromleeds Hi Skunker, an additional 29 year old here yet from the UK. I really made a trip over to NY in June to experiment with the verse yet the audiologist recommended the Otolens so I chose to proceed with that (spared rehashed trips forward and backward to the states). I'm gradually getting used to them, albeit at first I had various issues with the fit and different other specialized issues. I was guaranteed it was expected to having one of the principal sets to be fabricated in europe in front of the dispatch date so they gave me an additional couple of years guarantee which was a reward I presume. I am working them utilizing my iphone, which is sensibly fruitful, so if your T2 work still isn't working possibly give that a shot?

With respect to the genuine listening device execution, well I am liable of being vain and really staying away from always utilizing portable hearing assistants as of not long ago, so I comprehend that it will require some investment to get used to them. Principally in light of the fact that the sounds like consoles tapping, and so forth that I have missed in the past my mind now grabs and focuses on them more than somebody who is utilized to it would. I comprehend this ought to reduce with time. I have noticed a quite sensible change in my listening ability, absolutely superior to already in larger part of conditions. It is however still precarious to translate the TV, and there are essentially a few people groups voices that I find dubious. I figure to a degree I have turned out to be so acclimated to visual prompts I sort of frenzy a bit when I can't see the individual. Again I trust this will enhance with time and I will begin to end up noticeably more reliant on my listening aptitudes once more. Eventually I surmise that even somebody with idealize hearing misses things so I shouldn't expect 100%.

As far as the visuals, well I was somewhat disappointed at the promoting of the item that proposes 100% intangibility, and illustrations discharged by Starkey recommended it sat directly down alongside the ear drum. I was told I have typical ear trenches (regarding size, shape and symmetry) so was a decent possibility for fitting, nonetheless I felt that they didn't rest as far down as I'd have loved. Unquestionably not undetectable in any case, however to a great degree circumspect would be a reasonable judgment. I am almost certain that nobody has seen them yet. Non of my companions have said anything and I'm certain on the off chance that they saw them they'd be sufficiently charmed to inquire.

In the work put (I'm a drug specialist) it gets very occupied, with a variety of accents and back ground commotion, so a significant requesting hearing condition, in any case I trust they offer a change. I generally look out for what's around the bend however! I'm quick to research the implantable gadgets trialing in Germany.

Tsenekos well I got my otolens' on friday

the t2 worked while my audi was fitting them now its not working backpedaling to get it settled

i like that i can utilize my telephone with no criticism

they are not as far in my waterway like in the advertisement she said its the way my trench's are ?????

i wish they were clear not dark

try not to like the angling line tear rope hanging out

i think for the $$ they are alright recently happy I can assert them on my charges

wongtmn Hi, there,

I just went to my audi to attempted the otolens. Like most other individuals, my ear waterway is too little to fit the entire otolens into the second twisted. Subsequently, I have the otolens half into second bowed and half in the first twisted. It fits further into my ear trench than my current Widex Inteo CIC, however I can touch the otolens with my fingers. The sound quality is somewhat superior to my Widex Inteo, maybe the intensification is higher, however there is impediment. I have half vents for the Inteo, however my audi didn't make the air vent in the otolens on the grounds that there is no more space.

My inquiries are

1) I read in an article that air vents lessen impediment however in the give up of sound quality. Would half be able to vents be made in the otolens? Would it be a good idea for us to make vents for otolens? My audi recommended to make a vent on the external surface of the shell, will it work?

2) Since the otolens is not totally in the second twisted, what's the advantage of otolens versus an IQ S11 CIC given that the 2 utilize a similar chip? Shouldn't I remain with the IQ S11 which is substantially less expensive?

Much obliged.

T.

dr.amy You can change the volume by utilizing your cellphone as a remote control, yet there is no volume wheel on the guide itself. I don't know how well the do in the moist climate, I haven't had any patients wear them through a hot summer yet

dr. amy

Tsenekos Hi Im taking a gander at the otolens and simply thinking about how they function if the climate is hot and muggy? I have issue with my in the ear phonaks I generally need to continue pushing them in when its hot and they screech so terrible. Do you discover the otolens does this aswell?

Likewise I see there is no volume control like my phonaks so they are on full constantly or would you be able to change the volume some way or another?

much appreciated and happy to hear such a large number of are having positive things with these new guides

here's to you

dr.amy Originally Posted by skunker

It has been a while so I'd thought I'd post my most recent sentiments about the Otolens:

The Otolens has helped me to hear better, no inquiry there. Be that as it may, they have been sent back once on account of the T2 not working effectively.

The main significant issue I'm having right now is that the correct guide/ear still appears to be "stopped" up. The left guide/ear feels flawless and I can hear sounds much clearer on that side, regardless of the settings being the same for both ears. I can't feel the guide in my left ear, be that as it may, the correct ear feels like I have my forefinger stuck in. Thinking the correct guide might be excessively enormous for the channel, I had my audi granulate it down a little and we wound up doing it excessively and made the guide slip out all alone as the day advances. Oh no! In this way, sent the guide back to get remade and Starkey wound up modifying the guide in light of the returned help, not the first ear form! In this way, gotta send it back again.....

Meanwhile, does anybody have any guidance or recommendations on the most proficient method to reduce the "stopped up' sentiment the correct guide? What would it be able to be? I am certain I have the vents clear. When I put a speaker specifically before me, the sound is clearer on my left side and sounds somewhat louder, notwithstanding every one of the settings being the same. Maybe I ought to complete another ear impression for my correct ear? This issue is the main thing shielding me from being totally happy with the Otolens.

Much appreciated.

I would have the guide modified in light of another impression. Also, to have your audi check on the change frame WHY it needs revamped so they can give careful consideration to that impediment

dr. amy

skunker It has been a while so I'd thought I'd post my most recent emotions about the Otolens:

The Otolens has helped me to hear better, no inquiry there. In any case, they have been sent back once in light of the T2 not working effectively.

The main real issue I'm having right now is that the correct guide/ear still appears to be "stopped" up. The left guide/ear feels immaculate and I can hear sounds much clearer on that side, in spite of the settings being the same for both ears. I can't feel the guide in my left ear, be that as it may, the correct ear feels like I have my forefinger stuck in. Thinking the correct guide might be excessively enormous for the waterway, I had my audi pound it down a little and we wound up doing it excessively and made the guide slip out all alone as the day advances. Oh no! Along these lines, sent the guide back to get reconstructed and Starkey wound up revamping the guide in view of the returned help, not the first ear shape! Along these lines, gotta send it back again.....

Meanwhile, does anybody have any exhortation or recommendations on the best way to mitigate the "stopped up' sentiment the correct guide? What might it be able to be? I am certain I have the vents clear. When I put a speaker specifically before me, the sound is clearer on my left side and sounds somewhat louder, in spite of the considerable number of settings being the same. Maybe I ought to complete another ear impression for my correct ear? This issue is the main thing shielding me from being totally happy with the Otolens.

Much appreciated.

dr.amy I have not very many patients who favor the TV program when staring at the TV. The one circumstance in which patients have seen an unmistakable advantage is when viewing the TV while other individuals are talking in a similar room - it appears to help more in that condition. Be that as it may, if everyine in the room is sitting in front of the TV and being generally peaceful, you most likely won't require the TV program.

Regardless of whether it's buildup or not involves sentiment but rather patients report discourse being all the more clear. They can in any case hear commotion, however it's not as overpowering. What the IQ innovation does is diminish the measure of clamor between syllables of discourse so that a general reduction in pick up doesn't need to be actualized. They really aren't the main maker that uses this strategy. The new GN Resound Alera helps utilize it also.

Expectation that makes a difference!

dr. amy

Listener Ok, so now summing up with my 2 last inquiries concerning Otolens:

1-one of the projects is particular for TV, what do Otolens clients reports about this? Is it sufficient?

2-Is IQ too more a buildup that a compelling utility in clamor? Or, on the other hand Otolens clients reports a great deal more solace as well as discourse understanding in loud circumstances?

Much appreciated

dr.amy Originally Posted by Listener

...what's more, only one more inquiry, Dr. Amy: do Your Otolens-fitted patients reports likewise enhanced directionality?

PS: standard augmentation, this inquiry is for each audiologist who will discover time and will to answer. Much obliged to You

(wish I could get Otolens... be that as it may, my left ear does not concede me )

Totally - in truth the enhanced sound quality they report is normally in circumstances where directionality and limitation are vital. What's more, in light of the fact that these guides give the regular directionality and confinement that different styles of helps can't, they are awesome for individuals who are deficient with regards to that with current guides.

Remember that it isnt the innovation inside the guide essentially that gives these advantages, it's the idea of the arrangement of the guide. The OtoLens is a top of the line portable amplifier with abnormal state help innovation, however the situation of these guides in the ear is the thing that myself - and my patients - have observed to be generally useful. Since different styles are pursuing this to some degree incomprehensible assignment of giving regular directionality. Different styles can be useful, yet amplifiers set outside the ear will never have the capacity to FULLY repeat restriction given by mouthpieces set near the eardrum IMHO.

dr. amy

dontay I experienced same difficulty with T2 yet found no issue in the event that you put the real telephone catch your squeezing several crawls from the ear instead of utilizing the telephone in the typical listening position.

Listener ...and only one more inquiry, Dr. Amy: do Your Otolens-fitted patients reports likewise enhanced directionality?

PS: standard expansion, this inquiry is for each audiologist who will discover time and will to answer. Much obliged to You

(wish I could get Otolens... in any case, my left ear does not give me )

dr.amy Originally Posted by Listener

Hi!

An inquiry regarding Starkey AND Otolens...

By perusing remarks on Starkey around the site, I found that Starkey absences of innovation with regards to directionality. So alright, a BTE needs directionality to better comprehend what occurs before wearer, however...

Actually, directionality is "oversaw" by the pinna, isn't that so? If it's not too much trouble amend in case I'm in off-base. In the event that it's the pinna and considered where Otolens is set, would it be able to be that it needn't bother with any directionality at its amplifiers?

I have a tendency to trust I'm wrong some place, yet until the point that You don't answer, I won't expel this open inquiry from my head

Precisely right. The directionality originates from common separating of the pinna. I initially imagined that that the way that it's undetectable would be the best thing about the OtoLens, yet my patients have really announced that they choose to keep their guides since they like the sound - the imperceptibility figure is fairly auxiliary. This comes after the underlying time of getting used to where the guide sits in the ear.

dr. amy

Listener Hello!

An inquiry regarding Starkey AND Otolens...

By perusing remarks on Starkey around the site, I found that Starkey absences of innovation with regards to directionality. So alright, a BTE needs directionality to better comprehend what occurs before wearer, however...

Normally, directionality is "oversaw" by the pinna, correct? It would be ideal if you remedy in case I'm in off-base. On the off chance that it's the pinna and considered where Otolens is set, would it be able to be that it needn't bother with any directionality at its receivers?

I have a tendency to trust I'm wrong some place, however until the point when You don't answer, I won't expel this open inquiry from my head

skunker For those with the Otolens/iSync ...do you all vibe like you have something stuffed in your ear when you wear them?

My left ear is fine...no "stopped" sensation there, yet my correct ear trench feels like it's stopped. I had my audi trim down the guide, however it's as yet feeling very stuffed in there.

MatthewJones Aprsl: Shocking? No - Shameful, yes...

Mantoine: Where'd ya go!? New ears and you're finished as of now. Man - Talk about imperceptible!!

burra Originally Posted by burra

The main other thing about the otolens' is that on account of where they sit in the waterway it is for all intents and purposes difficult to enough check the fitting (i.e do genuine ear estimations or 'discourse mapping') - so as a clinician you have to truly depend on the customer giving you legitimate criticism (which is hard! ever been asked "how does that sound?" - my reaction to that inquiry in a center office would be "buggered on the off chance that I know - it just sounds diverse!"

Sorry - this isn't right - I have figured out how to utilize test tubes and the confirmation procedure functions admirably! I'm getting more used to the otolens' also now and am truly content with them!

burra Originally Posted by SilenceIsGolden

Hello there Burra

Since you have the Otolens fitting comfortable, what do you think about their execution? I've never worn any HA, yet, so I'm occupied with what you believe being in a circumstance to analyze agains different CICs and even BTEs

John

It'd be extraordinary in the event that you could trial both - actually I incline toward BTEs however I''ve been truly awed and flabbergasted by the otolens... concerning contrasting and different cics - I don't have direct involvement yet I have fitted a couple of veras (for the most part itcs with directional mics and a couple of cics) and individuals have loved them.... siemens makes cics that have bluetooth capacity if that is a need for you

burra All in all I am truly inspired with the otolens'.. I should concede - I have been something of an "open fit" bte fan in the course of recent years and have presumably even been a bit blinkered - However, doing whatever it takes not to be excessively one-sided I have as of late been experimenting with the Starkeys (first arrangement 11 cics and now otolens')....

Right off the bat - it is totally astonishing how they make them that little - recollecting that the battery takes up a large portion of the room inside!

To the extent correlations are concerned, I'm careful that I am a specimen of 1 so you won't perceive any of my suppositions (and they are just assessments) in any logical diary

There are advantages and disadvantages with every single listening device. The geniuses of the otolens' are that they are imperceptible, they are sensibly agreeable (not as agreeable as an open fit bte however as I would like to think - in spite of the fact that I should concede not having anything behind my ear is pleasant), no wind clamor, have no input, extraordinary for typical telephone use..... what's more, stable quite great...

With respect to the sound there are a couple of issues.. right off the bat - they don't have directional receivers - so while I can hear genuinely well in commotion, I can hear better with my BTEs... Likewise the idea of custom amplifiers imply that they don't enhance as high along the recurrence range as other portable hearing assistants.

Likewise, contingent upon your own particular needs you may like remote/bluetooth compatability.. the otolens doesn't have this (and in the event that they did would need to be made a great deal greater - consequently nullifying the point of what they were intended for). They likewise don't have a few elements that are accessible in other portable hearing assistants.

The main other thing about the otolens' is that due to where they sit in the waterway it is for all intents and purposes difficult to enough check the fitting (i.e do genuine ear estimations or 'discourse mapping') - so as a clinician you have to truly depend on the customer giving you legit criticism (which is hard! ever been asked "how does that sound?" - my reaction to that inquiry in a center office would be "buggered on the off chance that I know - it just sounds distinctive!"

Having said that - in case you're after an imperceptible listening device, are overcome enough to get a profound impression taken, will be tolerant and discuss issues with your audiologist, and know that they mightn't be correct first go - then I'd exceptionally suggest in any event attempting the otolens... I've had a few customers who have adored them, some who would not like to pay the cost for them, some who discovered them awkward, and some who (like me) at first discovered them awkward, yet after a redo are extremely cheerful.

SilenceIsGolden Hi Burra

Since you have the Otolens fitting comfortable, what do you think about their execution? I've never worn any HA, yet, so I'm keen on what you believe being in a circumstance to think about agains different CICs and even BTEs

John

burra I got my changed otolens' today... they are a HUGE change! As an audiologist I just suggest what I'd wear myself - and I should concede I was somewhat anxious in the wake of having solace issues at first... Starkey have been incredible and made them again - they're littler and not all that bendy.. also, agreeable!!! I tend to like more pressure than what starkey at first suggests (i.e noisy sounds overpower me a bit so I like them compacted).

So my recommendation is whether you have comfort issues - be persistent and get them revamped - you'll be happy when they work!

Likewise - while I'm over the entire requirement for listening devices to be imperceptible (I have a couple of red BTEs )... you can't see the otolens' by any stretch of the imagination - and I know how critical this is for some people....

morgagni I plan to buy a Thinklabs electronic stethoscope. The more seasoned model, ds32a Digital Electronic Stethoscope, is sold out all around and I trust that the Thinklabs new model will be best for me. Be that as it may, I can hear heart sounds, circulatory strain sounds, entrail sounds and breath sounds utilizing the Littmann Cardiology III stethoscope without listening devices. The issue is utilizing the listening devices with a stethoscope. The stethoscope ear tip needs to fit well into the ear channel to accomplish an appropriate seal and I require an attachement, for example, the steth-o-mate to cover the listening device in the ear waterway. Indeed, even the Otolens is not sufficiently far in the channel to permit the Littmann Cardiology III stethoscope ear tips to permit a decent seal without touching the Otolens. A similar issue is probably going to happen with the Thinklabs electronic stethoscope. I will require a decent seal to improve the sound.

skunker Thanks for your survey, morgagni.

I additionally may send my correct ear piece back for some alteration on the size as my correct ear still damages when utilizing it. I think it might be too enormous or not fitting in with my ear waterway on a par with it should.

About the stethoscope...why don't you simply get an opened up scope? My specialist (spend significant time in cardiovascular) utilizes one and he let me tune in to my own heart- - we found an exceptionally black out heart mumble that can't be gotten with general degrees. With my listening ability as terrible as it seems to be, despite everything I had no issue hearing the mumble.

morgagni I just gotten my new Otolens amplifiers on Thursday. Today is Sunday. The audiologist trusts that the Otolens should be revamped to go further into the waterway. There is some impediment noted, yet not very troubling. I have to utilize these with a stethoscope and they do work with my Littmann Cardiology III, however I think about whether a stheth-o-mate ear tip appended to the stethoscope might be a superior arrangement. My present ear tips do touch the Otolens. This restrains the seal that I can make with the stethoscope ear tips. The Otolens is better than the Oticon Dual loaner that I was utilizing as to twist clamor in my convertible, aggravating portable hearing assistant development related with visit taking off of my glasses amid the day, and much better discourse segregation in an eatery after chapel today, and better stable quality in chapel today. I have no tingling however I do have some distress somewhere down in the left ear. This is the ear that the audiologist thought was the one that required most to have the ear form impression revamped. It may not be fitting accurately. To new Otolens wearers, ensure that the ear form is right when you are having the underlying fitting. My audiologist is exceptionally useful and is amped up for the conceivable outcomes of these gadgets. Additionally, they totally can't be seen by my better half, notwithstanding when she is attempting to identify them.

aprsl Originally Posted by mantoine

I just got the oto focal point 2 weeks back and have truly been battling with them. I am a first time wearer of HAs. I ran with the otolens due to it being an ICI and until the point that I read your post I was not satisfied with them. I had a feeling that I was living in a tin can. subsequent to perusing that I might not have them in sufficiently far, I went and snatched them and place them in decent and tight and the distinction is astonishing! I'm interested to perceive how they are grinding away tomorrow. I was taking them out all the time since I was so awkward in them - tingling, had a craving for everything was truly reverberating. I trust it is that I simply wasn't driving them in sufficiently far.

Much obliged once more!

Stunning that your audi let you leave the workplace without adequate preparing or without them understanding that you were not embeddings them accurately.

skunker It's gotta be near the eardrum for it to be compelling.

mantoine I just got the oto focal point 2 weeks back and have truly been battling with them. I am a first time wearer of HAs. I ran with the otolens in view of it being an ICI and until the point that I read your post I was not satisfied with them. I had an inclination that I was living in a tin can. subsequent to perusing that I might not have them in sufficiently far, I went and snatched them and place them in decent and tight and the distinction is astonishing! I'm interested to perceive how they are grinding away tomorrow. I was taking them out all the time since I was so awkward in them - tingling, had a craving for everything was truly resounding. I trust it is that I simply wasn't driving them in sufficiently far.

Much obliged once more!

SilenceIsGolden Hi Skunker

I am at the phase of choosing HAs, and until the point when your survey I was ignorant of the Otolens yet now extremely intrigued. I see somebody remarked that they are $3450 every, which I assume is the US$ taken a toll? How could you touch base at the choice to choose these, especially given their high cost?

On the off chance that they are head and shoulders superior to whatever else around, at that point maybe I could broaden the home loan for a couple of years and get them, however in the event that they are just a minimal change, at that point I would go for a standard CIC.

I'm quick to perceive how everything goes once you have the second guide back and makes camp. Is it true that you are discovering them comforatable now, despite the fact that you need to push them in so profound? I'm considering how the hellfire the battery fits that far in?

here's to you

John

dave10 Originally Posted by skunker

Today I backpedaled to my audi interestingly since the underlying fitting and got the chance to meet a Starkey/Otolens rep in the meantime. He particularly worked with me (my audi shadowed) and changed the settings. He likewise confirmed that the left piece was not working appropriately and organized to have it transported back to the processing plant for repair. Nonetheless, the progressions he made on the correct piece worked GREAT. I could hear my own particular discourse better. Somebody in the workplace made a remark that I "redressed the way I talked".

No issues up to this point! Anticipating recovering the other one. I figure this may work for me all things considered!

P.S> The starkey rep likewise enacted some shrouded includes in the product that are obscure to most audis unless they bring in. Whatever it was, it appeared to offer assistance.

That is incredible news Skunker, a debt of gratitude is in order for sharing your news. Does that mean you'll be wearing just a single amplifier for some time? I recollect when I needed to send one back for repair and it was entirely odd having just a single guide in, truly trim sided. I trust you get things rectified soon and can report back when you recover the left guide.

Dave

skunker Today I backpedaled to my audi interestingly since the underlying fitting and got the opportunity to meet a Starkey/Otolens rep in the meantime. He particularly worked with me (my audi shadowed) and changed the settings. He additionally discovered that the left piece was not working appropriately and organized to have it dispatched back to the processing plant for repair. In any case, the progressions he made on the correct piece worked GREAT. I could hear my own particular discourse better. Somebody in the workplace made a remark that I "redressed the way I talked".

Things are progressing pretty well! Anticipating recovering the other one. I figure this may work for me all things considered!

P.S> The starkey rep additionally initiated some concealed components in the product that are obscure to most audis unless they bring in. Whatever it was, it appeared to offer assistance.

aprsl Originally Posted by skunker

aprsl,

I get a little occlusion...does that mean the guides are not fitted effectively?

I don't have a clue. What does your audi say?

aprsl Originally Posted by chriscooper00@gmail.com

The otolens look incredible, can't see them in your photographs. Since you've had them for some time, how are they? Worth the costs? Will look at them on Tuesday, so inquisitive about the potential entanglements and where to center my inquiries.

As far as it matters for me they are justified regardless of the cash. I've really had a decent ordeal seeing that eliminating foundation commotion however I still can't seem to attempt them in a genuine swarmed stay with many individuals talking.

I would inquire as to whether he's fit any some time recently. I would not have any desire to be his/her first since it is so profound.

I think they are altogether required to go to Starkey preparing to fit the Otolens yet I'll let the audis here address that.

Went in today for my second fitting and was told he had another product refresh to introduce. He additionally changed the pick up.

wmtomlinso Wow, those pics are astounding. I at present wear a Starkey S arrangement CIC yet they are as yet obvious. The dissensions you had before were essentially similar protestations I had when I initially began wearing listening devices - they leave after you get used to them.

Will call my audi tomorrow to look at these. A debt of gratitude is in order for your audit!!

skunker Hey people,

I'm upbeat to report that there has been a really decent change each since my somewhat negative audit I posted a couple of days prior.

For one, individuals have disclosed to me that my listening ability "has progressed". A major constructive has been the capacity for me to hear and chat with individuals effectively while driving. Discourse has been clear in the auto (and my auto is uproarious). Previously, I have abstained from transporting companions/associates/and so forth in my own particular auto because of my listening ability issue. Nonetheless, this may change...

Foundation clamor is still too noisy at eateries, I can hear the server better this time around.

chriscooper00@gmail.com The otolens look awesome, can't see them in your photographs. Since you've had them for some time, how are they? Worth the costs? Will look at them on Tuesday, so inquisitive about the potential entanglements and where to center my inquiries.

skunker aprsl,

I get a little occlusion...does that mean the guides are not fitted accurately?

aprsl Let me include my two pennies here.

I am likewise a current Otolens wearer (2 weeks).

They are truly stunning. There is zero impediment and zero input.

The left side appears like it might be somewhat free yet the audi says we can send that back to be remedied. On the correct side I truly overlook that I'm wearing it.

Lucidity and discourse acknowledgment is fine. I truly have no grievances.

The cost is steep. $3,450 per. In any case, I think we will see different makers create aggressive items and the cost will presumably descend.

xbulder Originally Posted by dr.amy

I know about their sound learning and many guides have perfect live showings - it doesn't change the way that i have not very many patients that favor their sound quality and input has dependably been an issue with their guides.

What's more, putting custom forms on an open fit guide to dispose of input is a band-help. With helps out there that have abnormal state input administration frameworks, nobody ought to need to endure diminished pick up to control criticism.

Furthermore, i think Skunker needed them to be undetectable in the first place, despite the fact that i could not be right about that...

dr. amy

I had fitted a couple of Unitron YUUs-their soundlearning is stunning. It has functioned admirably for me when the patitent needs to be intensely include in their fitting. I think they are on to something for the individuals who need to have more control.

dr.amy Originally Posted by xbulder

I dont ordinarily fit siemens however it has a solid arrangement of components. Read about sound learning 2 and NAL NL2 (IM GLAD IT FINALLY OUT THERE!!!!). I recollect Harvey dillon introduction on NAL NL2 no less than 3-4 yrs prior!!! The new siemens has an exceptionally flawless live demostration

I know about their sound learning and many guides have slick live exhibitions - it doesn't change the way that i have not very many patients that incline toward their sound quality and input has dependably been an issue with their guides.

Also, putting custom shape on an open fit guide to dispose of criticism is a band-help. With helps out there that have abnormal state input administration frameworks, nobody ought to need to endure diminished pick up to control criticism.

What's more, i think Skunker needed them to be imperceptible in the first place, in spite of the fact that i could not be right about that...

dr. amy

Neilk Originally Posted by dr.amy

Siemens Pure??? Not barely - unless he loves tuning in to a consistent piercing criticism...

dr. amy

The criticism I encountered while trialing the Pures was settled by my audi with a custom shape, like a CIC. Obviously, that didn't enable the tinny, metallic to sound, which she couldn't escape them ... why I'm so content with my YES IX's. Not expected to commandeer the string ... need to hear more about these imperceptible guides. I do discover however that the recurrence transposition of the YES, otherwise known as SoundRecover, had a major effect with discourse acknowledgment. Simply making things louder does not empower one to hear the frequencies that they are dead to, so sounds are lost. Volume can't supplant the dead hair cells that get those frequencies. Moving those sounds to another recurrence that can be heard I believe is the response to discourse acknowledgment. In any event it worked ponders for me.

xbulder Originally Posted by dr.amy

Siemens Pure??? Not scarcely - unless he enjoys tuning in to a consistent sharp criticism...

dr. amy

I dont regularly fit siemens however it has a solid arrangement of elements. Read about sound learning 2 and NAL NL2 (IM GLAD IT FINALLY OUT THERE!!!!). I recall Harvey dillon introduction on NAL NL2 no less than 3-4 yrs prior!!! The new siemens has an extremely flawless live demostration

Dirkie Originally Posted by skunker

While the volume in everything is amplified a bit, despite everything i'm experiencing difficulty unraveling discourse on the off chance that I can't see their countenances.

You seem to depend a considerable measure on lipreading. As a training, I would propose that you speak with individuals you're comfortable with without lipreading. It would take persistence, practice and some time until the point that your mind gets used to understanding discourse without being reliant on lipreading.

dr.amy Siemens Pure??? Not barely - unless he prefers tuning in to a steady shrill input...

dr. amy

xbulder Originally Posted by skunker

All things considered, today was the first occasion when I had the opportunity to try out the Otolens in "this present reality". I work 10hr moves in an office setting with individuals talking over their PC desk areas shouting to different associates. While the volume in everything is amplified a bit, regardless i'm experiencing difficulty translating discourse on the off chance that I can't see their appearances. Things with high frequencies are loud...and I can hear other individuals' cellphone ring tones going off, consoles being tapped on, and a woman's high heels a few doors down, and so on, however discourse is still somewhat stifled (despite the fact that my associate has a major New York/Bronx drawl that is difficult to deciper!)

I figure you can state this was a misfortune and made me very discouraged. I was seeking after a gigantic change, yet it is by all accounts negligeable up until this point.

Perhaps despite everything I have to get my cerebrum to adjust to all the new sounds? I additionally think about whether maybe the Otolens are not sufficiently profound in my ear trenches. I have seen photographs and recordings demonstrating the Otolens considerably more profound than how I wear mine.

Ultimately, I got the T2 capacity to work, yet now I can't get the left guide to react accurately.

I have an arrangement this Friday with my audi. Ideally we can get some of these issues fixed. I'm a little let down up until now, however perhaps things will enhance in the following couple of days? I will report back.

Would you be able to return them and attempt some other guide like a siemens Pure, Phonak exelia, Oticon agil?

xbulder Originally Posted by skunker

All things considered, today was the first occasion when I had the opportunity to try out the Otolens in "this present reality". I work 10hr moves in an office setting with individuals talking over their PC desk areas shouting to different collaborators. While the volume in everything is amplified a bit, regardless i'm experiencing difficulty unraveling discourse on the off chance that I can't see their appearances. Things with high frequencies are loud...and I can hear other individuals' cellphone ring tones going off, consoles being tapped on, and a woman's high heels a few doors down, and so on, however discourse is still somewhat suppressed (despite the fact that my associate has a major New York/Bronx drawl that is difficult to deciper!)

I figure you can state this was a mishap and made me very discouraged. I was seeking after a gigantic change, yet it is by all accounts negligeable up until now.

Possibly regardless I have to get my cerebrum to adjust to all the new sounds? I likewise think about whether maybe the Otolens are not sufficiently profound in my ear waterways. I have seen photographs and recordings demonstrating the Otolens considerably more profound than how I wear mine.

In conclusion, I got the T2 capacity to work, however now I can't get the left guide to react accurately.

I have an arrangement this Friday with my audi. Ideally we can get some of these issues rectified. I'm a little let down up until this point, however perhaps things will enhance in the following couple of days? I will report back.

Im not amaze T2 DOES NOT WORK, many people appear to gripe this DOES NOT WORK, yet hold up a moment t2 is best in class, prove based, and so forth...

Truly, its been a while and starkey should settle this

skunker Well, today was the first occasion when I had the opportunity to try out the Otolens in "this present reality". I work 10hr moves in an office setting with individuals talking over their PC desk areas shouting to different colleagues. While the volume in everything is amplified a bit, regardless i'm experiencing difficulty decoding discourse on the off chance that I can't see their countenances. Things with high frequencies are loud...and I can hear other individuals' cellphone ring tones going off, consoles being tapped on, and a woman's high heels a few doors down, and so forth, yet discourse is still somewhat muted (in spite of the fact that my collaborator has a major New York/Bronx drawl that is difficult to deciper!)

I figure you can state this was a difficulty and made me very discouraged. I was seeking after an enormous change, however it is by all accounts negligeable up until now.

Perhaps regardless I have to get my mind to adjust to all the new sounds? I additionally think about whether maybe the Otolens are not sufficiently profound in my ear channels. I have seen photographs and recordings demonstrating the Otolens considerably more profound than how I wear mine.

In conclusion, I got the T2 capacity to work, however now I can't get the left guide to react accurately.

I have an arrangement this Friday with my audi. Ideally we can get some of these issues fixed. I'm a little let down up until now, however perhaps things will enhance in the following couple of days? I will report back.

Behra Congrats Skunker. Things are progressing pretty well for you. I have restored the phonak exelia, awesome HAs yet could'nt change in accordance with the BTE style. I will trail the Otolens (have effectively given the impressions) to check whether it will work for me to some degree (possibly around half, I trust). If it's not too much trouble update us as often as possible on your involvement with Otloens in "this present reality"

skunker Originally Posted by dave10

Will need to concur with ABB: they're imperceptible. In the second picture, I can *maybe* persuade myself that there is some surface operating at a profit of the shadow, yet simply that. Where is the extraction line? That is the part I figured would provide an obvious insight that there's a portable amplifier in there, yet I don't see it!

More contemplations as you continue getting used to them would be most refreshing here.

Dave

I think in the main picture you might have the capacity to see the "ball" that is toward the finish of the extraction wire. I don't know, however.

skunker Originally Posted by stream2525

80 db misfortune and you are getting that quite a bit of advantage? That is incredible. I treid Starkey IQ yet didn't profit a great deal from them.

It would seem that your misfortune is somewhat more profound than mine in the high frequencies. In what helps did you attempt the Starkey IQ? The one thing I have perused is that since the Otolens is so near your ear drum, it channels the sound superior to BTEs, CICs, and so on. With respect to now, there is no shrieking, criticism or impediment, however I've been for the most part inside the previous 2 days).

Starkey said the Otolens' fitting extent is quite to 100db, however for "best practices" they posted it as 80db on the fitting graph.

Pick up is just around 35db, I accept. This is the place the present innovation restriction is.....just need to hold up a couple of more years and we ought to have some better stuff available.

Regardless I can't decode motion picture/television discourse anyplace near 90-100%, however I can show improvement over beforehand.

skunker Originally Posted by ABB

Amazing. Imperceptible, in fact! How would you get them out?!

I utilize my forefinger to push the extraction wire against the ear and uncover them with finger nail. Entirely simple.

dave10 I'm must concur with ABB: they're undetectable. In the second picture, I can *maybe* persuade myself that there is some surface operating at a profit of the shadow, however just that. Where is the extraction line? That is the part I figured would provide an obvious insight that there's a portable hearing assistant in there, yet I don't see it!

More contemplations as you continue getting used to them would be most refreshing here.

Dave

stream2525 80 db misfortune and you are getting that a lot of advantage? That is awesome. I treid Starkey IQ yet didn't profit a ton from them.

ABB Wow. Undetectable, in fact! How would you get them out?!

Ask a question

Title:

Article text:

Ask a question
Categories
Recent posts
Streamline TV connection issues
Sep 23, 2018 - ( 0 answers )
Streamline tv problem
Sep 23, 2018 - ( 0 answers )
Phonak B12. Itchy/dry ears
Aug 18, 2018 - ( 0 answers )
Hearing aid ear hook
Jul 28, 2018 - ( 0 answers )
volume control
Jul 05, 2018 - ( 1 answer )
Recent answers
Found exact repl battery at AliExpr... on "Oticon Streamer 1.4 battery replacement"
I would like to point out my gratit... on "Costco Rexton Trax 42 (Product Information)"
If you contact Phonak, they will on... on "ComPilot replacement battery"
I am trying to replace my lost owne... on "volume control"